Art. 07 – Vol. 23 – No. 3 – 2013

A Proposal for the ICT Oriented Analysis Framework of the National Innovation System (I)

Gabriel Neagu

G Vladimir Florian

Marilena Ianculescu

National Institute for Reasearch & Development in Informatics, ICI Bucharest

Abstract: The FORSEE project, funded by the South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, has its main objective to provide a regional Foresight methodology and a proving pilot exercise to support transnational collaboration in developing strategic plans for RDI in the ICT domain. The starting point in implementing the project was the study of the current status of RDI system, generically called National Innovation System (NIS), in each partner country. The focus of this study was on the ICT domain. The aim of the paper is to provide an outline of the NIS report for our country, in terms of an analysis framework which consists of the document structuring approach, the Eurostat and World Bank concepts and statistical indicators used for each section of the document, and their illustrative instantiation for our country according to the EU or wider international area documents. The paper is structured in two parts, devoted to structural and performance oriented NIS analysis, respectively. In the first part, after short considerations about the role of research and innovation to strengthen the competitive potential at micro and macro economic levels, a short overview of the FORSEE project is available, followed by the presentation of the structural vision about NIS: national context of the RDI evolution, the configuration of the ICT country profile, and the main NIS components (coordination, resources and specialised organizations). The second part of the paper will be devoted to the performance vision on NIS.

Keywords: FORSEE project, research-development-innovation, NIS, structure oriented vision, ICT profile, statistical indicators.


  1. BARR, S. H.; BAKER, T.; MARKHAM, S.K.; KINGON, A.I.: Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned From 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol.8, No. 3, 2009, pp. 370-388. ( sons%20Learned%20From%2014%20Years%20of%20Commercialization%20of%20Technol ogy%20Education.pdf)
  2. CURTIS, S.: Four in five technologies fail to cross the ‘Valley of Death’. Techworld. 02 May 2013. (
  3. LARSEN, P. B.; VAN DE VELDE, E.; DURINCK, E.; PIESTER, H.N.; JAKOBSEN, L.; O, SHAPIRH.: Cross-sectoral Analysis of the Impact of International industrial Policy on Key Enabling Technologies. European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry, 2011 (
  4. VEDPURISWAR, A. V.; CHOWDHARY, N.; GHORI, A.S.K.: Managing Technological Innovations. SQI Incorporated. n.d. Web. August 2013 ( s.pdf)

View full article

5.  TIDD, J.: A review of innovation models. Imperial Collage London. (

  1. Ernst & Young . 2012. EYInnovation. A series about achieving growth through innovation. Issue 4, 5 December 2012. ($FILE/EYInnovation_Issue4.pdf)
  2. OECD: The measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Guidelines For Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 2005.
  3. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Innovation Input and Output. October, 2011. (
  4. NEAGU, G.; FLORIAN, V.; IANCULESCU, M.: National ICT Innovation System Study, PESTLE&SWOT Analysis-Romania. Proiectul FORSEE, februarie 2012. (         /D3.3-3.4_NIS_PESTLE_SWOT_Romania_297.pdf)
  1. PRO INNO EUROPE, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT) with the contribution of DG JRC G3 of the European Commission: Innovation Union Scoreboard 2010 about Romania. (
  2. Europe’s Digital Competitiveness Report – ICT Country Profiles. Commission staff working document, volume 2, Brussels, 17.5.2010 (
  3. EUROSTAT – Regional science and technology statistics, Regional labour market statistics ( se.
  4. WORLD BANK GROUP: Doing Business 2012 – Doing Business in a More Transparent World. Washington, 2011. (
  5. World Bank and International Finance Corporation: Doing Business Report 2011 – Making a Difference for Entrepreneurs. Washington, 4.11.2010. (
  6. RANGA, M.: ERAWATCH COUNTRY REPORTS 2010: Romania. ERAWATCH Network, November 2010. ( pdf)
  7. ANCS: Politici guvernamentale în domeniul cercetării-dezvoltării şi inovării în Romania. Raport 2010. (
  8. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry: Innovation Patterns and Innovation Policy in European Regions – Trends, Challenges and Perspectives. The Regional Innovation Monitor – Project No. 0932, 2010 Annual Report, 20.04.2011. (
  9. Comitetului Român pentru Infrastructuri de Cercetare: Raportul 2007. ANCS, ianuarie 2008. (



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.