Art. 02 – Vol.23 – No. 2 – 2013


Nazime Tuncay

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports, North Cyprus

Abstract: TEL (Technology Enchanted Learning) helps students to take more control over their knowledge and help them to be more motivated, more self-directed, more organized and more strategic. A research study is carried out with 100 lyceum students in North Cyprus to drive information about their TEL awareness and reflect this about the metaphors. The results were on behalf of boys; they were more aware of TEL than girls. Students stated that; their parents do not let them to use technological devices. What is more, they claimed that TEL cannot be used in courses; because their teachers do not use them. Further research studies to find the reasons of students’ claims are recommended.

Keywords: TEL, Students, TEL Awareness, TEL Reflection, Metaphors


  1. AZEVEDO, R.; CROMLEY, J. G.; SEIBERT, D.: Does adaptive scaffolding facilitates students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary educational psychology, 2004, 29 (3):344-370.
  1. CEMAL NAT, M.; DASTBAZ, M.; BACON, L.: Research and design challenges for developing personalised e-learning systems. E-learn 2008 proceedings: world conference on e-learning incorporate, government, healthcare, and higher education 2008. Ed/itlib digital library, association for the advancement of computing in education (aace), chesapeake, va, usa: 2536-2542, 2008.
  2. DUBE, C.; KANE, S.; LEAR, M.: The effectiveness of students redrafting continuous assessment tasks: the pivotal role of tutors and feedback. Perspectives in education. 30(3):50-59, 2012.
  3. ELBERS, E.: Classroom interaction as reflection: learning and teaching mathematics in a community of inquiry. Journal of educational studies in mathematics, 54 (1):77-99, 2003.
  4. FLAVELL, J. H.: Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. in l. b. resnick (ed.), the nature of intelligence, 1976, pp. 231– 236.
  5. MCCLINTOCK, D.: Metaphors that inspire ‘researching with people’: uk farming, countrysides and diverse stakeholder contexts. Phd thesis (milton keynes, the open university) 1996.
  6. PHELPS, R.; ELLIS, A.; HASE, S.: The role of metacognitive and reflective learning processes in developing capable computer users. Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the australian society for computers in learning in tertiary education (ASCILITE), 9-12 december 2001, melbourne, 2002, pp. 481-490.

View full article

  1. PAMMER, V.; KNIPFER, K.,; KROGSTIE, B.; WESSEL, D.; PRILLA, M.; LINDSTAEDT, S.: Reflective learning at work – a position and discussion paper. arnets11 (awareness and reflection in learning networks). Proceedings of the 1st european workshop on awareness and reflection in learning networks. Palermo, Italy, september 21, 2011. online:
  1. PRAMLING, I.: Developing children’s thinking about their own learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58: 266-278, 1988.
  2. PRILLA, M.; KNIPFER, K.; DEGELING, M,; CRESS, U.; HERRMANN, T.: Computer Support for collaborative reflection on captured teamwork data.. CEUR workshop proceedings ( vol: 790. Workshop on awareness and reflection in technology-enhanced learning (#artel11) 2011. Available online:
  3. ROUX, A LE; MDUNGE, P.: Difficult conversations: lessons learnt from a diversity programme for pre-service teach. Perspectives in education. 30 (3):78-87, 2012.
  4. SEZER, R.: Integration of critical thinking skills into elementary school teacher education courses in mathematics. Education, 128 (3): 349-362, 2008.
  5. SCHÖN, D.: The reflective practitioner. 1st ed, Aldershot, Hants England: Arena Ashgate Publishing Limited, 1991.
  6. ULIERU, V. D.; DRAGHICESCU, L.; PETRESCU, A.; STANCESCU, I.: Metacognition and learning styles. In proceedings of the 5th wseas/iasme international conference on engineering education, (EE’08), World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (wseas), Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2008, pp. 49-54.
  7. LAKOFF, G.: Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
  8. LAKOFF, G.: The contemporary theory of metaphor. In a. ortony (ed.), metaphor and thought, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 202-251.
  9. LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M.: Metaphors we live by. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  10. ORTONY, A.:Metaphor and thought. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  11. SNODGRASS, A.; COYNE, R.: Models, metaphors and the hermeneutics of designing. Design issues, 1992, 9(1): 56 – 74.