Tuesday , 20 October 2020
roen

Art. 06 – Vol. 25 – No. 1 – 2015

Software Selection – A Complex Multi-Criteria Decision Problem

Delia Mihaela Rădulescu
delia.mihaela2010@gmail.com

National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest

Abstract: In the past 20 years, software selection has become an area of active research due to its complex nature. Researchers have more focused on the selection of specific software and less on general models and methods to solve this problem. Software selection is a multi-criteria decision problem that relates to the selection of a software product from a variety of software products based on evaluations in software using a set of criteria. The most suitable methods that can be applied to the problem of selection software products are multi-attribute decision methods in which the set of alternatives is a finite, nonempty and the set of criteria and possibly sub-criteria, is clearly established, finite and measurable. The article provides a review of research on software selection problem and construct a general model of evaluation and selection based on multi-criteria approach.

Keywords: software, selection, evaluation, multi-criteria decision, multi-attribute methods, model.

REFERENCES

  1. ANDRAŞIU, M.; BACIU, A.; PASCU, A.; PUŞCAŞ, E.; TAŞNADI, A.: Metode de decizii multicriteriale. Editura Tehnică. Bucureşti, 1986, 198p.
  2. ATAŞ, G.; GUNGOR, V. C.: Performance evaluation of cloud computing platforms using statistical methods. În: Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40(5), 2014, pp. 1636-1649.
  3. BALOG, A.; RĂDULESCU, C. Z.; RESTEANU, C.; TÎRZIU, E.; MITAN, E.; SIPICĂ, A.; PREDA, S.; RĂDULESCU, D.M.: Tema de cercetare: Metode, modele şi instrumente de asistare a decidenţilor în selectarea produselor software, Faza 1: Studiu privind cercetările şi realizările în domeniul proiectului, ICI, decembrie, 2014, 72 p.
  4. DURÁN, O.: Computer-aided maintenance management systems selection based on a fuzzy AHP approach. În: Advances in Engineering Software, 42(10), 2011, pp. 821-829.
  5. FIGUEIRA, J.; GRECO, S.; EHRGOTT, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer, New York, 2005, 1048p.
  6. FILIP, F.G.: Decizie asistată de calculator: decizii, decidenţi, metode de bază şi instrumente informatice asociate. Bucureşti: Ed. Tehnică, 2005, 376 p.
  7. GARG, S.K.; VERSTEEG, S.; BUYYA, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. În: Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(4), 2013, pp. 1012-1023.
  8. GODSE, M.; MULIK, S.: An approach for selecting software-as-a-service (SaaS) product. În: IEEE International conference on cloud computing, 2009.
  9. GRAU, G.; CARVALLO, J. P.; FRANCH, X.; QUER, C.: DesCOTS: a software system for selecting COTS components. În: Proceedings of 30th EUROMICRO Conference , IEEE, 2004.
  10. HUANG, C. L.; YOON, K.: Multi attribute decision making: methods and applications. Springer, New York, 1981, 270 p.
  11. JADHAV, A. S.; SONAR, R. M.: Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. În: The Journal of Systems and Software, 84(8), 2011, pp. 1394–1407.

View full article

  1. KARSAK, E.; ÖZOGUL, C. O.: An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection. În: Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 2009, pp. 660-667.
  2. KEENEY, R.; RAIFFA, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, 1993, 569 p.
  3. KORHONEN, P.; LEWANDOWSKI, A.: Multiple Criteria Decision Support, Amsterdam: Springer, 1991.
  4. KUNDA, D.: STACE: social technical approach to COTS software evaluation. În: Component Based Software Quality, Springer-Verlag, LNCS 2693, 2003, pp. 64–84.
  5. LEUNG, K.R.P.H.; LEUNG, H. K.N.: On the efficiency of domain-based COTS product selection method. În: Information and Software Technology 44, 2002, pp. 703–715.
  6. LIN, H. Y.; HSU, P. Y.; SHEEN, G. J.: A fuzzy-based decision making procedure for data warehouse system selection. În: Expert Systems with Applications, 32(3), 2007, pp. 939–953.
  7. NGAI, E.W.T.; CHAN, E.W.C.: Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. În: Expert Systems with Applications, 2005, pp. 1–11.
  8. MOLLAGHASEMI, M.; EDWARDS, J.: Technical briefing: making multiple objective decisions. În: Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997.
  9. OH, K.; LEE, N.; RHEW, S.: A selection process of COTS components based on the quality of the software in a special attention to internet. În: HIS 2003, LNCS 2713, 2003, pp. 626-631.
  10. OZERNOY, V. M.: Choosing the “best” multiple criteria decision-making method. În: INFO, 30, 1992, pp. 159-171.
  11. RĂDULESCU, C. Z.: Decizie Multicriterială, metode şi aplicaţii în dezvoltare durabilă. În: Editura Printech, 2013, ISBN: 978-606-23-0025-8, 274 p.
  12. RESTEANU, C.; SOMODI, M.; VADUVA, I.: On the Exams of a Multi-Attribute Decision Making E-Course. În: Analele Universitatii de Vest din Timisoara 46.2, 2011.
  13. SAATY, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  14. SANTHABAN, R.; KYPARISIS, J.: A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. În: European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 1996, pp. 380-399.
  15. SANTHABAN, R.; KYPARISIS, J.: A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. În: Computers and Operations Research, 22(8), 1995, pp. 807-818.
  16. STAMELOS, I.; VLAHAVAS, I.; REFANIDIS, I.; TSOUKIAS, A.: Knowledge based evaluation of software systems: A case study. În: Information and Software Technology, 42, 2000, pp. 333–345.
  17. VERVILLE, J.; HALLINGTEN, A.: An investigation of the decision process for selecting an ERP software: the case of ESC. În: Management Decision, 40 (3), 2002, pp. 206–216.
  18. VINCKE, P.: Multicriteria decision aid. New York: Wiley, 1992, 174 p.
  19. YOON, K.; HWANG, C.: Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: An Introduction, Sage Publisher, 1995.
  20. ZELENY, M.: Multiple criteria decision making. McGraw-Hill. New York, 1982, 563 p.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.