Saturday , 7 December 2019
roen

Art. 04 – Vol. 25 – No. 1 – 2015

An Integrated Methodological Approach in the Evaluation of Augmented Reality Platform for Learning

Dragoş Daniel IORDACHE
iordache@ici.ro

National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics – ICI Bucharest

Abstract: This paper presents an integrated methodology for assessing a teaching-learning platform based on technology augmented reality developed in the European project ARiSE (Augmented reality in the school environment). The first part of the paper presents a brief introduction to the issue of augmented reality technology. The following sections address the evaluation of educational applications and detailed presentation of the integrated methodology for assessing the learning platform. The paper ends with conclusions and directions for future work.

Keywords: augmented reality, mixed method evaluation.

  1. AZUMA, R.: A Survey of Augmented Reality. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1997, pp. 355-385.
  2. BALOG, A.; PRIBEANU, C.; IORDACHE, D.: Augmented Reality in Schools: Preliminary Evaluation Results from a Summer School. International Journal of Social Sciences Volume 2 Number 3. ISSN 2070-3872, 2007, pp.163-166.
  3. BALOG, A. (ed.): Calitatea sistemelor interactive. Editura Matrix Rom, Bucuresti, 2004.
  4. CRISTEA, S.: Dicţionar de pedagogie, Grupul Editorial Litera Educaţional, Chişinău, 2002.
  5. HARTSON, H. R.; ANDRE, T. S.; WILLIGES, R. C.: Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. Internat. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 2001, pp.373–410.
  6. IORDACHE, D. D.; PRIBEANU, C.: Cum ajută realitatea îmbogăţită înţelegerea chimiei – un model bazat pe indicatori cauzali. (Ed.) Interacţiune Om-Calculator 2013. ISSN, Editura MatrixROM Bucureşti.

View full article

REFERENCES

  1. IORDACHE, D. D.: Evaluarea unei aplicaţii de învăţare bazată pe realitate îmbogăţită utilizând protocolul « gândire cu voce tare » şi metoda învăţării în perechi. Revista Română de Interacţiune Om-Calculator. Vol. 5 (1) 2012, pp. 185-198.
  2. IORDACHE, D. D.; PRIBEANU, C.; VILKONIS, R.: A user-centred design approach to the development of AR-based educational systems”. Proccedings of ICTNSE International Conference – 2007, Siauliai 3-4 December 2007, pp. 66-70.
  1. IORDACHE, D. D.; NEACŞU, I.: Evaluarea a două aplicaţii de realitate îmbogăţită destinate mediului şcolar – focus grup cu cadre didactice. Revista Romana de Interactiune Om-Calculator 5 (2), 2012, pp. 19-24.
  2. JOHNSON, B.; CHRISTENSEN, L.: Educational research, Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2008.
  3. MOLICH, R.; JEFFRIES, R.; DUMAS, J.: Making usability recommendations usable. Journal of Usability Studies, 2(1), 2007, pp. 162-179.
  4. MOLICH, R.; NIELSEN, J.: Improving a human-computer dialogue, Communications of the ACM 33(3), 1990, pp. 338-348.
  5. OLIVER, M.: The ELT Toolkit. University of North London, 1998. http://www.unl.ac.uk/tltc/elt/toolkit.pdf
  6. PRIBEANU, C.; IORDACHE, D. D.: Evaluating the motivational value of an augmented reality system for learning chemistry. Holzinger, A. (Ed.) Proceedings of USAB 2008. LNCS 5298 Springer, 2008, pp. 31-42.
  7. THEOFANOS, M.; QUESENBERY, W.: Towards the Design of Effective Formative Test Reports, Journal of Usability Studies, Issue 1, Vol.1, 2005, pp. 27-45.
  8. WIND, J.; RIEGE, K.; BOGEN M.: Spinnstube®: A Seated Augmented Reality Display System, Proceedings of IPT-EGVE – EG/ACM Symposium, 2007, pp. 17-23.

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.